Archive for April, 2007

Media Relations Tip

Friday, April 27th, 2007

One thing that you need to remember when being interviewed for a television or radio piece, especially if it refers to a product and or company, is to state your product or company name a lot. Instead of saying, “We are proud to blah, blah, blah.” you should say, “ABC Company is blah blah blah” or “ABC Product helps blah, blah, blah.” Why? Because in television pieces the super (graphic) shows up for only a few seconds and can be missed since stories are fairly short, and unlike in print or online where you can go back and read the piece to see who the quote is attributed to.

Bad Crisis Management - Blackberry (RIM) and Rutgers

Wednesday, April 25th, 2007

Research In Motion (RIM) has given us yet another example of bad crisis management. RIM “remained largely quiet” during an outage that left an estimated five million users of the popular BlackBerry wireless email device without service. As all crisis managers know, a lack of immediate response leads to a vacuum which is almost always filled with negative perception and commentary. The company was sharply criticized for not immediately responding to the public.

For example, let’s look at the Wall Street Journal coverage: Black Berry User Stew in Wake of Outage

  • “an outage that left an estimated five million users of the popular BlackBerry wireless email device without service angering some customers and fueling speculation about what may have been at the root of the failure.”
  • “Corporate BlackBerry users said they found the company’s silence puzzling, given the unprecedented scope of the outage”

The article also quoted some key customers who were very unhappy. This is extremely hurtful to the company and its sales force in particular, and makes an already negative article that much more damaging:

  • “I find their reluctance to discuss the event a bit baffling — it undermines their credibility,” said John Halamka, chief information officer for Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, who oversees 270 BlackBerry users at Beth Israel and 200 more at Harvard Medical School. All were affected by the outage for eight hours or more, he said.
  • Eugene Stein, chief technology officer at the law firm White & Case LLP, which has about 1,900 BlackBerry users, concurred with that assessment. “They’re very quiet on this,” said Mr. Stein who said he has kept up with the situation through media reports and was eager to determine whether the failure is likely to be repeated.

When criticized for not issuing a statement, “a Research In Motion spokeswoman said that determining the full root causes of the outage would take more time.”

This is the number one mistake made in crisis management. RIM should have immediately issued a statement, followed by updates, which would have helped control the message and mitigate negative commentary.

Ultimately, RIM shares fell $1.88, or 1.4%, to $132.49.

Rutgers Women’s basketball/Imus

The Rutgers Women’s basketball team also had an opportunity to turn around and better control a hurtful message, but instead the team met with Don Imus and issued a statement addressing race relations. This is disappointing, they had an opportunity to talk about their accomplishments as a team and steer away from the controversy , but instead fell right into the debate trap started by Imus, Al Sharpton, and others. Thus the story remained about Imus’ racial remarks, and not about the unbelievable accomplishments of the team.

The crisis management principles remain the same, yet we continue to see organizations make the same classic blunders. I suspect we’ll continue to see more.

The Irony of Imus

Tuesday, April 17th, 2007

[Derogitory comment by Don Imus] = 1*
[Mention of Imus’ comment in news] = 1,076

* Don Imus apologized.

The Irony/Hypocrisy of the News Media
Somehow it’s okay for the the media to continue using (and profiting from) the demeaning statement that Don Imus used once. (It still doesn’t excuse what he said). It’s been repeated thousands of times during the past two weeks, and anybody who understands the media business knows that more readers and more eyballs means more dollars. Let’s face it, if you want people to read your story online, what phrase should you be putting in your headline? Oh the irony.

CBS leads the way with the hypocrisy train.
Could You Call Oprah A Nappy . . . (you know the phrase)?
Nancy Giles tries to turn it into some story about more women having a voice. I agree with her idea, but she’s spreading the same ugly message Imus did, and she’s doing it under the leadership of the very company that fired the old codger.

“Nappy (demeaning phrase) Or African Queen? Rutgers Graduate Pens New Book Entitled I’m African and Proud
I hope this lady’s book is great. Does she realize I found this page in Google news because she’s using the phrase to try and sell books? Oh the irony.

ROKER: There is no joy in what has transpired . . . via MSNBC
Good for Roker for not using the term in his headline. He actually buried in his column somewhere.

The court of public opinion

Thursday, April 12th, 2007

Read The court of public opinion if you want. This is a follow-up to that post.

I’ve been thinking lately about how often the media shamelessly convicts people in the court of public opinion because it’s good for news. That’s a lie. They do it because it’s good for business.

Chris Knudsen touched upon it himself just today A note on society, and that post actually reminded me of some examples that show how people get convicted for crimes in the public’s eye but not in the courts or by actual juries.

Example One: Geek Squad/BestBuy sued for tech videoing girl in the shower
Thoughts: First off, Consumerist needs to get it’s headline straight. The tech allegedly did the videoing, not the company. I think we all know why the girl (who you often see smirking in the video) is suing a deep-pocketed company instead of some perv with a fake badge and a white shirt and black tie. Is he guilty? That’s exactly what I don’t want to decide in this post.

Court of public opinion?
Watch the news story, the journalist says “This news conference has just ended, so we haven’t had time to contact either BestBuy or the Geek Squad.” That’s because the evidence seems to say guilty and the attorney didn’t want BestBuy to comment before hand. She knew the media would jump all over it and wouldn’t miss the press conference.

More examples will come soon. p.s., I actually have a new website being developed right now that will address these very issues in the media and with PR people. Stay tuned.

Army ad campaign falls on its face

Tuesday, April 10th, 2007

I’ve wondered at times why the Army or any other armed service spends so much money on advertising campaigns for recruits when the results of the media coverage is much more powerful in getting people to not want to join. Do they really believe that some commercial about dressing up in camo and using night vision is going to alter the perceptions of the following?

- U.S. military changes how it brings dead soldiers’ bodies home
- Two more Fort Riley soldiers dead in bomb attack
- 10 U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq over weekend

I think we all get the picture. I’d even argue that the $200 million a year Army campaign is not only not working but it’s having ZERO affect on getting the recruits they want.

“We’re enlisting more dropouts, people with more law violations, lower test scores, more moral issues,” said a senior noncommissioned officer involved in Army personnel and recruiting. “We’re really scraping the bottom of the barrel trying to get people to join.” via NYTimes.com

Can you Imagine the Job Description?
World’s biggest spending budget! Great benefits. Lot’s of sun. Two-months of paid, on-the-job training. Lot’s of exercise. Free room and board. Shifts are one-year on, four months off. Work isn’t guaranteed after that, but very likely.

Now, I want to make sure and say I appreciate what the soldiers do, but I think it is completely laughable for the armed forces to think that advertising is going to counter what we’ve all read in the press on a daily basis for the last four years.